Incidental meningiomas discovered during intracranial aneurysm clipping: The importance of intraoperative dural biopsy

Article information

J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2026;28(3):312-315
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 May 8
doi : https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2026.E2025.12.005
1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea
2Department of Neurosurgery, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea
Correspondence to Bong-Gyu Ryu Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea Tel +82-31-787-7167 Fax +82-31-787-4097 E-mail neurosurgeryryu@gmail.com
Jae Seung Bang Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea Tel +82-31-787-7167 Fax +82-31-787-4097 E-mail nsbang@snubh.org
Received 2025 December 12; Revised 2026 March 29; Accepted 2026 April 20.

Abstract

The coexistence of an intracranial aneurysm (IA) and meningioma (MNG) is a rare clinical entity (0.13-1.17%). However, the prevalence of clinically occult MNGs may be underestimated, as routine vascular imaging often misses small lesions.

We present two female patients with a history of multiple or recurrent IAs and prior endovascular treatment. During surgical clipping via a pterional approach, suspicious dural lesions—hypervascularization and thickening around the anterior clinoid process—were incidentally identified, despite being invisible on preoperative imaging. Intraoperative biopsies confirmed these lesions as MNGs.

While the exact pathogenesis or underlying association remains speculative, these cases highlight the critical importance of unexpected intraoperative findings. Neurosurgeons must maintain high vigilance and strongly consider active biopsy of abnormal dura mater encountered during IA clipping, particularly in patients with multiple IAs or previous endovascular treatments.

INTRODUCTION

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are among the most frequently treated cerebrovascular diseases in neurosurgery, identified in approximately 1-3% of the general population [6,9]. Meanwhile, meningiomas (MNGs) are the most common primary brain tumors, accounting for about 30% of all intracranial neoplasms [5,8]. Although both conditions are relatively common, their coexistence in the same patient is a rare occurrence [2].

Most existing literature addresses cases where MNGs were clearly identified on preoperative imaging [1,3]. During routine cerebrovascular evaluations, which primarily rely on non-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA), small meningiomas might be radiologically missed. This study reports cases of such “clinically occult” or radiologically missed MNGs that were incidentally discovered through biopsy of suspicious dura mater during IA clipping surgery. Through these case reports, we highlight the importance of meticulous intraoperative observation of subtle changes in the surgical field and the necessity of proactive tissue sampling for suspicious findings.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Case 1

A 57-year-old female presented with a history of a ruptured right posterior communicating artery (PcomA) aneurysm treated with stent-assisted coiling, followed by clipping for recanalization after coil embolization. After returning to daily life following the treatment of the right PcomA aneurysm, she experienced a sudden, severe headache and underwent coil embolization for a ruptured de novo left PcomA aneurysm, which was not present at the time of the initial treatment. However, during follow-up, recanalization of the left aneurysm (max. 5.1 mm) was revealed. Considering the repeated recurrences and incomplete occlusion despite prior endovascular treatments, surgical clipping was selected as the definitive management strategy.

The surgery was performed via a left pterional approach. Upon opening the dura, hemosiderin deposition and generalized yellowish discoloration were observed, sequelae of the previous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Additionally, a thickened hypervascularized dura mater was identified around the anterior clinoid process (Fig. 1). To secure the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA), intradural anterior clinoid process (ACP) drilling was performed. During this procedure, tissue suspicious for a calcified meningioma was identified and harvested for biopsy (Fig. 2). After ACP removal, the recanalized aneurysm was successfully clipped using a fenestrated clip.

Fig. 1.

Intraoperative findings of Case 1, showing hypervascularized dura mater on the anterior clinoid process (white arrow).

Fig. 2.

Intraoperative findings of Case 1, demonstrating calcified dura mater (white arrow).

Histopathological examination confirmed a WHO grade I meningioma, psammomatous type, with a Ki-67 index of 1%. Both c-Met and EGFR were negative (Fig. 3). The patient was discharged without neurological sequelae.

Fig. 3.

Histopathological findings of Case 1, showing the presence of psammoma bodies (black arrow heads).

Case 2

A 50-year-old female presented to the emergency department complaining of tinnitus and diplopia. Subsequent diagnostic imaging revealed a right carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) and multiple IAs. The right CCF spontaneously occluded during an attempted endovascular treatment, but multiple IAs remained. She underwent a left craniotomy for the surgical management of aneurysms at the left PcomA, paraclinoid, and middle cerebral artery (MCA).

Intraoperatively, a hypervascularized dura mater at the ACP was noted (Fig. 4). To secure space for proximal control, intra-dural ACP drilling was performed, during which the abnormally thickened dural tissue was harvested for biopsy (Fig. 5). Subsequently, all three IAs were successfully clipped, and the surgery was concluded.

Fig. 4.

Intraoperative findings of Case 2, showing hypervascularized dura mater on the anterior clinoid process near the optic nerve (white arrow).

Fig. 5.

Intraoperative findings of Case 2, demonstrating abnormally thickened dura mater (white arrow).

The biopsy result confirmed a meningioma, meningothelial type. The Ki-67 index was 2%, and immunohistochemistry revealed overexpression of both c-Met (2+/3) and EGFR (2+/3) (Fig. 6). The patient recovered without complications and was discharged.

Fig. 6.

Histopathological findings of Case 2, showing an increase in cellularity (black arrow heads).

DISCUSSION

The coexistence of MNGs and IAs is a rare phenomenon, with previous studies reporting a concurrent incidence of 0.13-1.17% [4]. However, recent literature suggests that the actual prevalence may be significantly higher [1,2]. Notably, Kim et al. reported a significantly higher prevalence of 7.7%, suggesting that the true incidence is likely underestimated due to the lack of routine tumor-protocol imaging [7]. Consistent with this potential for underdiagnosis, this study demonstrates the discovery of MNG, which were not visible or suspected on preoperative imaging, through biopsy of suspicious dural changes found during aneurysm surgery.

While the hemodynamic stress hypothesis is well-established, it offers a limited explanation for our cases [7]. It is highly possible that the concurrent finding of IA and MNG in our cases is merely a coincidental co-existence. While one might cautiously speculate about potential underlying associations such as local inflammation, direct evidence is lacking, and over-interpretation should be avoided.

Another speculative factor is the potential for radiation-induced tumorigenesis following endovascular treatment. Radiation is a well-established risk factor for meningioma development [10,11]. While complex scenarios involving repeated endovascular procedures can result in cumulative radiation exposure, attributing the MNG solely to radiation in our cases requires caution due to the lack of precise dosimetric data and definitive latency periods.

Regardless of the exact pathogenesis, the primary clinical takeaway from these cases is the importance of intraoperative vigilance. In patients undergoing craniotomy for IA clipping, especially those evaluated primarily with non-enhanced MRA or CTA, where small tumors could be radiologically missed, neurosurgeons should not overlook abnormal dural changes. Thickened or hypervascularized dura mater, particularly around the anterior clinoid process, where proximal control is often obtained, should prompt active tissue biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The possibility of concomitant or radiologically missed MNGs should be considered. Therefore, during IA clipping surgery, if hypervascularization, abnormal discoloration, or dural thickening is observed, active biopsy should be strongly considered. This has significant clinical implications for the early detection of meningeal-origin lesions.

Notes

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

References

1. Abbas S, Boutarbouch M. Coexistence of cerebral aneurysm and meningioma: A case report. Radiol Case Rep 2024;Nov. 19(11):4886–9.
2. Abou-Mrad T, McGuire LS, Khalid SI, Theiss P, Alaraj A, Charbel FT. Concurrent meningioma and intracranial aneurysm: Insights from an updated systematic review and a case report. Surg Neurol Int 2024;Nov. 15:396.
3. Algburi HA, Sharma M, Ismail M, Albulaihed SA, Al-Gertani MR, Majeed SN, et al. The coexistence of anterior communicating artery aneurysm and meningioma: A literature review and illustrative case. Surg Neurol Int 2022;Dec. 13:569.
4. Atallah O, Alrefaie K, Badary A. Concomitant intracranial aneurysm clipping and meningioma resection: Surgical strategy and considerations. Cancers (Basel) 2025;Sep. 17(17):2908.
5. Baldi I, Engelhardt J, Bonnet C, Bauchet L, Berteaud E, Grüber A, et al. Epidemiology of meningiomas. Neurochirurgie 2018;Mar. 64(1):5–14.
6. Etminan N, Ruigrok YM, Hackenberg KAM, Vergouwen MDI, Krings T, Rinkel GJE. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and emerging concepts in unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Lancet Neurology 2025;Nov. 24(11):945–57.
7. Kim YH, Lee YJ, Han JH, Ahn S, Lee J, Kim JH, et al. Association of intracranial aneurysms and meningiomas: a case-control study. J Neurosurg 2015;Aug. 123(2):357–61.
8. McNeill KA. Epidemiology of brain tumors. Neurologic Clinics 2016;Nov. 34(4):981–98.
9. Rinkel GJE, Djibuti M, Algra A, van Gijn J. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 1998;Jan. 29(1):251–6.
10. Sadetzki S, Flint-Richter P, Ben-Tal T, Nass D. Radiation-induced meningioma: A descriptive study of 253 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery 2002;Nov. 97(5):1078–82.
11. Umansky F, Shoshan Y, Rosenthal G, Fraifeld S, Spektor S. Radiation-induced meningioma. Neurosurg Focus 2008;24(5):E7.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Intraoperative findings of Case 1, showing hypervascularized dura mater on the anterior clinoid process (white arrow).

Fig. 2.

Intraoperative findings of Case 1, demonstrating calcified dura mater (white arrow).

Fig. 3.

Histopathological findings of Case 1, showing the presence of psammoma bodies (black arrow heads).

Fig. 4.

Intraoperative findings of Case 2, showing hypervascularized dura mater on the anterior clinoid process near the optic nerve (white arrow).

Fig. 5.

Intraoperative findings of Case 2, demonstrating abnormally thickened dura mater (white arrow).

Fig. 6.

Histopathological findings of Case 2, showing an increase in cellularity (black arrow heads).