DISCUSSION
Even though the roadmapping technique has been available for four decades, Ayad et al. [
2] first reported 38 cases where it was used during open surgery mainly for arteriovenous malformation, dural fistulae, and one distal MCA mycotic aneurysm. Although they described it as an alternative intraoperative tool for neurovascular surgery to verify the location of the lesion preoperatively and immediately after dural opening, they did not describe its use during the microdissection or the resection of the lesion. The present paper describes the roadmapping technique in the microsurgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. This technique allows the neurosurgeon to navigate through the aneurysm anatomy and surrounding vessels with real-time assistance from angiographic images during the microsurgical dissection and treatment.
In our series, roadmapping technique was a valuable complementary resource during microdissection of complex ICA aneurysms (mainly for ventral/medial paraclinoid aneurysm) where the neck could not be clearly identified. This technique offered accurate location of proximal and distal neck boundaries, real-time image guidance and continuous feedback on the orientation of the clip blades during clip placement. Similarly, iDSA allowed a prompt identification of any residual aneurysm or parental vessel occlusion, calling for immediate clip repositioning. Overall, these features are considered the mainstay of this technique, thus culminating in no residual aneurysms or parental vessel occlusions in our series.
Aneurysm location is of paramount importance when planning the surgery, as it can determine the complexity of the approach and proximal control. In this series, the only case of an MCA aneurysm was a giant aneurysm that caused distorted local anatomy. All other treated aneurysms were located in the ICA, and shared common characteristics: giant, multiple, medial/ventral paraclinoid, and bilateral aneurysms. However, location alone should not determine the usefulness of this adjunct.
Regarding surgical morbidity, those patients who presented a poor functional outcome during follow-up had SAH with severe vasospasm resulting in delayed cerebral ischemia and malignant infarctions requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy (15.3%), followed by tracheostomy and gastrostomy. Interestingly, our rates of vasospasm were lower than those previously reported [
2], but the need for decompressive hemicraniectomy was higher [
10]. Both patients had mRS of ≥2 at three-months follow-up despite aggressive treatment against vasospasm and intracranial hypertension.
Several tools and techniques are available to increase safety and efficacy of the microsurgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms, such as indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography, intraoperative micro-Doppler, intraoperative CT scan, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the use of an HOR for iDSA for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes [
5,
8,
16,
18,
19,
26]. After the introduction of ICG video angiography, the use of iDSA has decreased, since the former allows the neurosurgeon to confirm the occlusion of the aneurysm and the patency of the parental vessels without the requirement of DSA equipment or the need of an additional invasive procedure. Nowadays, ICG video angiography is used commonly for intracranial/spinal AVMs and arteriovenous fistulas, but its use is limited by a narrow microscope field [
6,
9,
15,
21]. Instead, iDSA and roadmapping have the advantage of predefined real-time images to assess vascular architecture during the dissection and treatment of the aneurysm beyond the microscope’s field of view (i.e., medial/ventral paraclinoid aneurysm, carotid cavum aneurysms and contralateral aneurysm).
Other resources commonly used for tumor resection, such as intraoperative MRI and CT can also be used in vascular surgery to delineate the extent of resection of AVMs or cavernous malformations. However, its use is limited in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms [
1,
3,
8,
22]. Similarly, intraoperative micro-Doppler is a noninvasive and reliable tool for the evaluation of the parental and adjacent vessels in an aneurysmal clipping, but it is an operator-dependent study, and it cannot show any residual aneurysm [
23]. Nowadays, the HOR concept has been widely adopted in neurosurgical centers around the world. We consider that the HOR provides a variety of assets available during the surgical procedure, allowing us to perform not only intraoperative DSA but to perform hybrid treatment of intracranial aneurysms [
5,
18]. Recently, multiple reports have addressed the advantages of an HOR in different cerebrovascular diseases with acceptable outcomes and have included most of the benefits we mentioned before [
4,
11,
18,
19]. Gruber et al. revised all available intraoperative techniques, concluding that these methods are complementary rather than competitive in aneurysm surgery, a view with which the authors certainly agree [
9].
Some disadvantages of iDSA and the roadmapping technique include the comfort of the surgical team, the need for additional equipment including a radiolucent operating table, the required infrastructure of an HOR (or an OR equipped with a portable fluoroscope capable of performing roadmapping), and the availability of an experienced staff. Complications related to the procedure imply those previously reported for any angiographic procedure, ranging from 0.5 to 3.29% [
11,
12]. Furthermore, radiation exposure may be a concern; however, safety for the medical staff must be assured by maintaining the duration of the image acquisition and roadmapping to the minimum necessary and making certain of the continuous use of protective equipment. Importantly, the angiographic series obtained for roadmapping are acquired with the surgical team away from the C-arm. Then, when roadmapping is displayed, the fluoroscope is briefly activated at the request of the surgeon and only after dissection and clip positioning were initially performed under direct microscopic view, thus reducing radiation exposure.
With the aid of roadmapping, an adequate assessment of vascular anatomy can be obtained after careful dissection has been made in order to define anatomical landmarks and estimate initial clip positioning. One consideration worth mentioning is that roadmapping images are not an exact reflection of vascular anatomy since they are based on angiographic series acquired immediately before they are displayed and lack real-time feedback. Thus, any tissue shift during dissection and clip positioning should be taken into account in order not to misinterpret the actual anatomy and potentially lead to suboptimal results or catastrophic complications. Therefore, rather than an alternative to standard techniques, its use can be viewed as a complementary navigation system using intraoperative updated images.
The use of iDSA with roadmapping technique in an HOR for complex aneurysms (e.g., ventral/medial paraclinoid aneurysms, multiple aneurysms with a contralateral lesion for a planned unilateral approach and certain residual aneurysms) offers not only diagnostic DSA as needed, but also real-time image guidance during microdissection and clip positioning or repositioning, the latter being the main advantage for this technique. The use of roadmapping over conventional iDSA requires no additional equipment and provides a complementary tool that should be used in addition to iDSA to provide a safer clipping technique. Furthermore, the proximal control offered by an intra-arterial balloon, as well as the possibility of concomitant aneurysm embolization in selected cases, makes this intraoperative adjunct a valuable tool for vascular surgery. Another advantage of this modality is the ability to diagnose and treat vasospasm immediately after aneurysm occlusion has been confirmed. Besides from achieving these goals in a single stage, the patient’s transfer among different facilities is avoided, thus preventing further associated complications.
We acknowledge that this modality may not be universally available and should thus be tailored to specific cases. In our series, the included patients fullfilled certain characteristics that were thought to anticipate a complex procedure, such as size, previous treatment, dome projection, among others. Each case was thoroughly discussed among the endovascular and neurosurgical teams, and a consensual decision was chosen in every one of them. We acknowledge that some might opt for a pure endovascular treatment in particular cases, however due to financial and bureaucratic limitations, this is not always feasible at our institution, and if not done microsurgically, the treatment could be delayed, thus putting our patients’ lives under unnecessary risks. It would be interesting to describe this technique in different groups of aneurysms, such as posterior circulation aneurysms, which are generally not treated surgically at our center. Due to the high heterogeneity of intracranial aneurysms, it would be unreasonable to determine strict selection criteria for this surgical adjunct; therefore, the ideal strategy should be agreed upon by an experienced multidisciplinary team on an individualized basis.