J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg > Volume 27(4); 2025 > Article
Degollado-Garcia, Nicolas-Cruz, Marmolejo-Moreno, and Orenday-Barraza: Revascularization surgical options after carotid trauma: Case report from a cerebrovascular blood flow preservation overview

Abstract

An 18-year-old male underwent a tracheostomy that was complicated by an iatrogenic left-sided common carotid artery laceration, leading to loss of blood flow and a minor stroke in the anterior and medial territories of the left cerebral circulation. After the lesion was identified, carotid exploration was performed, followed by a vascular reconstruction using a synthetic graft to repair the damaged segment. This manuscript details the microsurgical techniques utilized and discusses the indications for this intervention, with a particular emphasis on stroke prevention.

INTRODUCTION

Craniocervical trauma causing vascular injury could be present in up to 3-20% of the cases, and they can be classified as either penetrating or blunt, depending on the mechanism of injury to the vessel. Blunt vascular injury includes motor vehicle accidents, falls, and direct blows from assault, in addition to similar injuries as a result of strangulation or whiplash injury [13]. Penetrating vascular injuries can result from skull base fractures, gunshots, stabbings, or penetrating debris, with high-velocity objects [11,12].
More specifically for carotid artery injuries, the prevalence ranges from 6% to 11% overall, with approximately 3-11% of cases occurring after penetrating neck trauma, with the most affected being the common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid arteries (ICA) [16], with a high risk of neurological sequelae and mortality, ranging from 50% to 66% [17].
Traditional surgical strategies have generally been limited to primary repair or ligation of the vessel. However, the management of carotid artery injuries has evolved, and today, various open and/or endovascular techniques are used for repair. Once hemorrhage control has been achieved, the surgeon must determine the appropriate approach for surgical repair [16].

CASE DESCRIPTION

An 18-year-old male, with a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay due to multiple traumas, was scheduled for a tracheostomy. During the procedure, a possible vascular injury of unknown origin was suspected following an estimated blood loss of 1,500 ml. After multiple vascular ligations and sutures, the bleeding was controlled. An apparent muscle injury was identified and was made to proceed with closure.
Twenty-four hours later, after achieving hemodynamic stabilization, the patient awoke with reduced strength in his right arm and leg. A computed tomografy angiografy (CTA) and carotid Doppler revealed the absence of blood flow in the left CCA and a minor stroke in the territories of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), along with narrowing of the arterial calibers (Fig. 1). Given these signs of cerebral hypoperfusion, the neurosurgery team was consulted, and it was decided to proceed with a carotid exploration and possible reconstruction.

Operative technique

Upon identifying the carotid bifurcation, the ICA, external carotid artery (ECA), and CCA were localized and secured with colored rubber bands for reference. Distal control was then achieved, followed by proximal dissection of the carotid artery below the brachiocephalic vein. A complete transection of the carotid artery, approximately 5 cm in length, was found in the proximal third. After obtaining proximal and distal control, the clamp was released distally, and a thrombectomy was performed with a 5 mm resection, restoring adequate retrograde flow. The same technique was applied proximally, and the artery was flushed with 0.9% saline solution and heparin.
Reconstruction was performed using a 6 mm diameter synthetic vascular prosthesis made of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) (Fig. 2). The first anastomosis was completed proximally using an end-to-end technique with a 90° cut, secured with 6-0 non-absorbable polypropylene (PROLENE) sutures, achieving adequate flow. For the distal anastomosis, a 45° cut was made to optimize the anastomotic diameter. Inverted sutures were used posteriorly with an endoluminal technique to limit graft movement, while a standard continuous technique was applied anteriorly, both using 6-0 PROLENE sutures. During the surgical procedure, the anesthesia team administed 5,000 UI intravenous to prevent thrombosis, and 24 hours after surgery we started a 100 mg aspirin PO, for 6 months. Once completing the anastomoses, all sites were irrigated with heparinized solution, and distal flow and pulsations were confirmed in both the ICA and ECA.
The platysma muscle was closed with 2-0 absorbable polyglactin sutures, and the skin was closed with 3-0 nylon sutures. A soft drain was placed, and the estimated blood loss by the end of the procedure was 100 ml.

Postoperative course

One hour after the surgery, sedation was discontinued, and the patient demonstrated significant clinical improvement. Strength in all four limbs was rated 5/5, and the patient was responsive to commands, though a speech evaluation was not performed due to the tracheostomy. Twenty-four hours postoperatively, a CT angiography confirmed adequate patency of the reconstructed (CCA). A carotid Doppler study indicated a velocity of 137 cm/s at the graft site (Fig. 3). The drainage was removed 48 hours after the surgery, and the patient was discharged from the ICU 72 hours post-procedure.

DISCUSSION

For partial carotid artery injuries involving less than 25% of the vessel’s diameter, debridement and repair with fine Prolene sutures are typically sufficient. However, more severe injuries, such as those caused by gunshot wounds, may require resection of the injured artery segment, with an interposition graft needed if the resection exceeds 1 centimeter. In cases where the laceration is located on the internal carotid artery (ICA), primary anastomosis can often be achieved through mobilization.
Injuries to the external carotid artery (ECA) can generally be repaired if feasible, or ligated, if necessary, with minimal risk of ischemia due to the ECA’s extensive collateral circulation [8,17].

Assessment for a carotid artery reconstruction

The patient in this case presented with a neurological deficit predominantly affecting the MCA territory, along with a small stroke in the watershed area. This suggests that collateral flow was maintaining the patient in a penumbra state, with the stroke attributed to a hypoperfusion event during the initial surgery, likely caused by bleeding [19].
Ideally, perfusion tests (CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)) with and without Diamox or CO2 challenge would be used to assess the cerebral blood flow, volume, time to peak (TTP), and mean transit time (TTM) both at rest and during vasodilatory challenge, to evaluate the patient’s “hemodynamic reserve.” [18] However, in this case, perfusion studies were unavailable. Considering the increased risk of another stroke in the event of acute hypotension or hypoperfusion, along with long-term risk of vascular dementia due to chronic hypoperfusion, the decision was made to perform revascularization of the entire carotid territory with a bypass graft [3,15].
Further scenarios could also be considered, depending on the viability of the carotid ends [5], the different surgical strategies analyzed by the senior neurosurgeon by his experience are explained in the Table 1.

Synthetic graft advantages and disadvantages

The CCA is typically repaired with a 6 to 8 mm ePTFE graft, which has demonstrated better outcomes when compared to a saphenous vein graft (SVG), with long-term patency rates of 88.9% and 66.7% respectively [2]. Also, it has demonstrated better tolerance and adaptability to the high flow and low resistance in the carotid bypass. Occasionally, the CCA is large enough to accommodate a 10 mm graft. In cases of contamination, a reversed SVG can be used as an alternative [6]. However, this method has the drawback of being prone to generate aneurysm or stenosis due to inherent characteristics of the vessel wall, including the presence of valves [4,7].

Bypass success confirmation

It is important to note that contrast studies only assess the patency of the graft and anastomoses, but do not provide detailed information about the flow through the graft itself. Therefore, both a CT angiogram and a Doppler study were performed. Using Doppler velocity (137 cm/s) and the graft diameter (6 mm), the flow rate was estimated using the formula Q=V×A, resulting in a calculated flow of 2,324 ml/minute through the graft. Although the normal carotid velocity is typically below 125 cm/s, it is expected that the carotid body and cerebral vasoreactivity will regulate this in the coming weeks [1,18].
The prevention periprocedural strokes and postprocedural are as important as the surgical technique, trans procedural intravenous administration of 5,000 heparin has demonstrated to prevent thrombosis of the bypass, and at least 6 months of aspiring after the procedure same as until the wall shear stress achieve self-regulation [9,10].
ICA injuries should be repaired in the same surgical procedure using a reverse SVG, a patch, or synthetic grafts. However, if the patient is hemodynamically unstable, addressing this instability should be the priority in the ICU. Carotid repair must then be completed within 6 to 24 hours of any neurological deficit or signs of ischemia to reestablish cerebral perfusion, as was done in the case presented [14].

CONCLUSIONS

In cases where clinical and radiological signs of cerebral ischemia without infarction are present due to carotid injury, vascular reconstruction is technically feasible using either an autologous or synthetic graft. This procedure should be performed once hemodynamic stabilization and bleeding control have been achieved, with the goal of preventing long-term cognitive impairment and atrophy. Care must be taken to avoid acute hemorrhage upon reperfusion as well.

NOTES

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Fig. 1.
(A) Coronal CTA, showing a small hypodensity in the left internal capsule suggestive of infarct. (B) CT reconstruction demonstrating non contrast flow below the left carotid bifurcation. (C, D) The Cervical Doppler showing the Cervical Doppler US with absent flow in the carotid artery with 20.4 cm/seg systolic peak, showing an abnormal carotid wave, which was non triphasic. CTA, computed tomographic angiography; CT, computed tomography; US, ultrasonography
jcen-2025-e2025-01-002f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Intraoperative images. (A) The initial surgical exposure and ligation using colored rubber bands—white for the CCA, blue for the ICA, and yellow for the ECA. (B) Permeabilization of the proximal carotid artery, proximal embolectomy and anastomosis technique with 90° degree cut and continuous stitches. (C) Distal anastomosis with 45° cut, inverted stitches in the posterior side using endoluminal technique to limit graft mobilization. (D) Final reconstruction view. CCA, common carotid artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; ECA, external carotid artery
jcen-2025-e2025-01-002f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Postoperative images. (A) Coronal CT with no increment of the hypodensity. (B) Reconstruction showing permeability of the carotid reconstruction. (C, D) Cervical Doppler US with normal parameters in the prebifurcation carotid artery (anastomosis site). (E) Normal carotid waves, triphasic shape and values. CT, computed tomography; CTA, computed tomographic angiography; US, ultrasonography
jcen-2025-e2025-01-002f3.jpg
Table 1.
Preoperative scenarios analyzed by the neurosurgical team and strategies proposed by the senior author personal experience.
Viability of vessel ends Donor Recipient Type of anastomosis Technique for the anastomosis Comments
Both ends viable Proximal common carotid artery (stump) Distal common carotid artery P: E-E 90° P: Continuous stitching If the gap is less than 1 cm, an anastomosis without graft could be pursued.
D: E-E 45° D: Endoluminal technique with inverted stitching in the posterior wall, and regular continuous on the anterior wall. If the proximal stump is viable but thrombosed, perform surgical thrombectomy with forceps or use a Fogarty catheter.
The 45° degree cut favors the diameter of the anastomosis and prevents the postoperative stenosis.
Proximal not viable but distal viable - Subclavian artery Distal common carotid artery P: E-S with fish mouth P: Continuous stitching For both subclavian artery and aortic arch, we suggest using two Satinsky clamp head-to-head in the superior part of the artery. This will allow sealing of the top of the vessel but allowing flow at the bottom of the vessel, entailing zero ischemic time.
- Aortic arch D: E-E 45° D: Endoluminal technique for posterior wall and regular continuous anterior wall
- Vertebral artery Pointing the toe to the proximal part of the vessel, will favor a more laminal flow through the anastomosis as it mimics a normal branching site.
Proximal viable but distal not viable Proximal common carotid artery (stump) Internal carotid artery P: E-E 90° P: Continuous stitching It is important to prioritize the internal carotid artery since the external carotid artery can always be irrigated by the contralateral one.
D: E-S with fish mouth D: Continuous stitching In this case, the toe must be pointing to the distal part of the internal carotid artery.
Proximal and distal not viable - Subclavian artery Internal carotid artery P: E-S with fish mouth P: Continuous stitching It is important to prioritize a larger donor but always using the simplest technique and the one which you are more familiar with.
- Aortic arch D: E-S with fish mouth D: Continuous stitching
- Vertebral artery

Preoperative scenarios of vascular injuries and surgical strategies for vascular anastomosis. In all the scenarios is considered, the use of interposition graft and using 6-0 or 7-0 Prolene for suturing. P, proximal end; D, distal end; E-E, end to end; E-S, end to side

REFERENCES

1. Claassen JAHR, Thijssen DHJ, Panerai RB, Faraci FM. Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: Physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation. Physiological Reviews. 2021 Oct;101(4):1487-559.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Donas KP, Schulte S, Pitoulias GA, Siebertz S, Horsch S. Surgical outcome of degenerative versus postreconstructive extracranial carotid artery aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2009 Jan;49(1):93-8.
crossref pmid
3. Duncombe J, Kitamura A, Hase Y, Ihara M, Kalaria RN, Horsburgh K. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion: A key mechanism leading to vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Closing the translational gap between rodent models and human vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Clinical Science. 2017 Sep;131(19):2451-68.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Ghosh B, SIbi Krishna T, Boini A, Castillo Miranda JCD, Sinha M, Bansal R, et al. Risk factors associated with saphenous vein graft aneurysm after coronary artery bypass graft. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2023 Sep;85(11):5604-10.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Hecht N, Wessels L, Fekonja L, von Weitzel-Mudersbach P, Vajkoczy P. Bypass strategies for common carotid artery occlusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Oct;161(10):1993-2002.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Illuminati G, Pizzardi G, Pasqua R, Nardi P, Calio FG, Ricco JB. Long-term results of polytetrafluoroethylene versus saphenous vein repair of degenerative carotid artery aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2020 Oct;72(4):1413-20.
crossref pmid
7. Lauder C, Kelly A, Thompson MM, London NJ, Bell PR, Naylor AR. Early and late outcome after carotid artery bypass grafting with saphenous vein. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2003 Nov;38(5):1025-30.
crossref pmid
8. Liekweg WG, Greenfield LJ. Management of penetrating carotid arterial injury. Annals of Surgery. 1978 Nov;188(5):587-92.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Mishani S, Belhoul-Fakir H, Lagat C, Jansen S, Evans B, Lawrence-Brown M. Stress distribution in the walls of major arteries: implications for atherogenesis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Aug;11(8):3494-505.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Naylor R, Rantner B, Ancetti S, de Borst GJ, De Carlo M, Halliday A, et al. Editor’s Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;65(1):7-111.
pmid
11. Nowicki JL, Stew B, Ooi E. Penetrating neck injuries: A guide to evaluation and management. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2018 Jan;100(1):6-11.
crossref pmid
12. O’Connor JV, Byrne C, Scalea TM, Griffith BP, Neschis DG. Vascular injuries after blunt chest trauma: Diagnosis and management. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2009 Sep;17:42.
pmid pmc
13. Patel J, Huynh TJ, Rao D, Brzezicki G. Vascular trauma in the head and neck and endovascular neurointerventional management. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. 2020 Jul;10:44.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Rabinstein AA. Update on treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Continuum (Minneapolis Minn). 2020 Apr;26(2):268-86.
crossref pmid
15. Rajeev V, Chai YL, Poh L, Selvaraji S, Fann DY, Jo DG, et al. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion: A critical feature in unravelling the etiology of vascular cognitive impairment. Acta neuropathologica Communications. 2023 Jun;11(1):93.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Serna JJ, Ordoñez CA, Parra MW, Serna C, Caicedo Y, Rosero A, et al. Damage control in penetrating carotid artery trauma: Changing a 100-year paradigm. Colombia Medica (Cali). 2021 Jun;52(2).e4054807.
crossref pdf
17. Weaver FA, Yellin AE, Wagner WH, Brooks SH, Weaver AA, Milford MA. The role of arterial reconstruction in penetrating carotid injuries. Archives of Surgery. 1988 Sep;123(9):1106-11.
crossref pmid
18. Wolf ME. Functional TCD: Regulation of cerebral hemodynamics—cerebral autoregulation, vasomotor reactivity, and neurovascular coupling. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience. 2015;36:40-56.
crossref pmid
19. Yuh WT, Alexander MD, Ueda T, Maeda M, Taoka T, Yamada K, et al. Revisiting current golden rules in managing acute ischemic stroke: Evaluation of new strategies to further improve treatment selection and outcome. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2017 Jan;208(1):32-41.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 1,822 View
  • 31 Download
ORCID iDs

Javier Degollado-Garcia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-6504

Related articles


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
The Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery (JCEN), Department of Neurosurgery, Wonkwang University
School of Medicine and Hospital, 895, Muwang-ro, Iksan-si, Jeollabuk-do 54538, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2279-9560    Fax: +82-2-2279-9561    E-mail: editor.jcen@the-jcen.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons and Korean NeuroEndovascular Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next